Bio Molecular Systems

How Will Labs Make the Most of Improved Testing Capabilities Post Pandemic?

Share this:

The COVID-19 pandemic has seen molecular testing technology and capabilities accelerate at an extraordinary pace. Between the need for real-time PCR equipment to detect the virus, and DNA sequencers to identify strains of the virus, there have been significant investments in testing capabilities and labs the world over.

Laboratories all over the world now have molecular testing instruments – and expertise – in place where they might have previously had limited capabilities or none at all. So what of the future? What will become of these capabilities as vaccines roll out and as we move into future phases of the pandemic?

In the immediate future

Of course, it’s reasonable to expect that the SARS-CoV-2 virus will be around for some time. In a Nature survey of immunologists, infectious-disease researchers and virologists, almost 90% believe that the coronavirus will be endemic. Lower income countries could be waiting years to be fully vaccinated, and even developed countries are seeing delays due to logistics and even ‘vaccine hesitancy’ (In France for example, only 41% of the public is willing to receive a vaccine). The emergence of new and more aggressive mutations may also extend the necessity of testing, whole-genome sequencing and vaccine development into the long-term future.

It’s therefore realistic that expanded testing equipment and expertise could be in use for COVID-19 testing over the next five or ten years or longer, and safe to say that investments in molecular testing facilities won’t be rendered ‘redundant’ overnight.

In the long term

While testing equipment gathering dust will be a positive sign that we’re getting on top of this virus, there will no doubt be further use and repurposing for lab equipment as the pandemic’s power fades over time.

The important factor of flexibility

The one question that’s been common amongst lab and facility managers investing in new lab equipment over the past year is how to ensure their investments won’t be wasted as testing needs and situations change. Our recommendation is to focus on flexibility. This includes:

  1. Cost flexibility
    That is, choosing a system that can be scaled up and down as needed, rather than simply buying the largest thermal cycler or liquid handling system to suit today’s relatively high needs.
  2. Operational flexibility
    That is, choosing compact and robust lab instruments that can be taken out into the field and easily mobilised, with simple or no calibration needed, and no expensive service contracts.
  3. Lab flexibility
    So in the case where a thermal cycler or liquid handling system is to be used for a different testing purpose, lab users can easily access and save to an assay library and define their own tube type if needed.

Speed is one other important factor for future-proof lab equipment, particularly in a testing environment. And above all, outstanding accuracy is the crucial factor to ensure lab users can be confident in the results they’re producing.

After more than a year of enhancing and expanding their capabilities for both COVID-19 testing and research, many laboratory managers are trying to both meet immediate needs and make practical choices for the future. By choosing equipment and systems that offer the flexibilities above, they can maximise both the resale and repurposing value of their investments.

Coming next: the lessons learned about accessibility

In the midst of accelerated expansion and rapid rollouts of testing equipment, there have been several lessons about making lab equipment accessible for all who need it. Stay tuned for our next article in this series, where we’ll discuss what’s been learned about molecular testing accessibility during the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

 

 

Exit mobile version